MGMT 8005M:Week 6: The Political Frame Essay Assignment Paper

We have advanced nursing paper writers to help on MGMT 8005M:Week 6: The Political Frame Essay Assignment Paper

MGMT 8005M:Week 6: The Political Frame Essay Assignment Paper

MGMT 8005M: Organizational Perspectives and Implications for Leaders | Week 6

There are few business activities more prone to a credibility gap than the way in which executives approach organizational life. A sense of disbelief occurs when managers purport to make decisions in rationalistic terms while most observers and participants know that personalities and politics play a significant if not an overriding role.”

-Abraham Zaleznik (1971, p. 52)

The word politics often conjures up a negative image, including notions of game playing, pursuing self-interest at the expense of the common interest, and pressure-group lobbying. Due to this negative image, some managers try to disregard politics within an organization. However, managers do not really have the option of ignoring politics. Politics are a fact, and to manage effectively, one needs to understand what politics are and how to approach and manage them. Bolman and Deal (2017) present a positive side to politics that can be realized if managed effectively. Managing politics means that one must make decisions and allocate resources in the context of scarcity, divergent interests, and conflict.

This week, you will study the decision-making process that occurred in the U.S. space shuttle Challenger disaster and the political dynamics that impacted the process and the outcome. Also this week, you will examine the ways that ecosystems impact organizations.

Learning Objectives

This week, you will:

• Analyze political dimensions of the U.S. space shuttle Challenger disaster
• Evaluate the interaction between ecosystems and organizational politics

Skills

You will develop the following skills:

• Analyze political dynamics in organizations
• Apply theoretical concepts to practical cases

Learning Resources

Note: To access this week’s library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Readings

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

• Chapter 9, “Power, Conflict, and Coalition” (pp. 181–200)
• Chapter 10, “The Manager as Politician” (pp. 201–215)
• Chapter 11, “Organizations as Political Arenas and Political Agents” (pp. 217–233)

Forrest, J. (2005). The space shuttle Challenger disaster: A failure in decision support system and human factors management. Retrieved from http://dssresources.com/cases/spaceshuttlechallenger/

Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

• Chapter 6, “Interests, Conflict, and Power: Organizations as Political Systems” (pp. 149–206)
• Exhibit 6.1, “Organizations and Modes of Political Rule” (p. 153)

MGMT 8005M:Week 6: The Political Frame Essay Assignment Paper

Discussion: Political Dimensions

According to Berkes (2016), for over 30 years to his death, the engineer Bob Ebeling had felt responsible for the deaths in the failure of the space shuttle Challenger in 1986. He and four other engineers as contractors with Morton Thiokol urged NASA the night before the launch to postpone the launch, as data indicated it was not safe due to the projected temperature the next day. Bob Ebeling’s guilt over the years was based on his feelings that he had inadequately built his case for not launching. One of Ebeling’s colleagues, Roger Boisjoly, in an interview with Howard Berkes of NPR responded to a question of Ebeling’s feeling of guilt with: “We did all we could. We were talking to the right people who had the power to stop the launch.”

Day 3: Initial Post

Post by Day 3 an analysis of the political dimensions of the U.S. space shuttle Challenger disaster, including an evaluation of the interaction between ecosystems and organizational politics. Please note below that in addition to Day 3, there is a required post on Day 5 and Day 7. The purpose of the two additional posts for the week is to extend the conversation throughout the week to have a more in-depth discussion. Details of these additional posts are below.

Day 5: Response

Respond by Day 5 to at least two of your colleagues’ postings. Be sure to address one of the following:

• Comment on your colleague’s posting.
• What insights did you gain from your colleague’s posting?
• Offer an alternative suggestion.
• If you reside outside of the United States, how might this information apply?

Day 7: Response

Respond by Day 7 to at least one of your colleagues who revealed an approach to the problem that is different from yours. How do your responses differ? How has considering your colleague’s position helped to inform your own?

Note: Include proper APA citations to support all statements by referencing at least two sources from this week’s recommended readings as well as two additional sources from relevant peer-reviewed publications.

We have advanced nursing paper writers to help on MGMT 8005M:Week 6: The Political Frame Essay Assignment Paper