MGMT 8005M:Week 4: The Human Resource Frame Essay Assignment Paper

We have advanced nursing paper writers to help on MGMT 8005M:Week 4: The Human Resource Frame Essay Assignment Paper

MGMT 8005M:Week 4: The Human Resource Frame Essay Assignment Paper

MGMT 8005M: Organizational Perspectives and Implications for Leaders | Week 4

Great vision without great people is irrelevant.

-Jim Collins (2001, p. 42)

TThe human resource frame of Bolman and Deal’s (2017) model focuses on the relationship of employees to the organization. An anecdote that illustrates relationships of employees to the organization is shared by John Shook (2008) on the Lean Enterprise Institute website. In 1984, he was working with Toyota in Japan on developing materials for training and development. A Japanese manager was troubled about a statement Shook had written on the board: “Our people are our most important resources.” (par. 1). The manager did not understand it and asked: “Who does ‘our’ and ‘resources’ refer to?” The manager stated, “Does it make any sense to say, ‘Our people are our most important asset when we are the people and the company is us?’” (par. 2). Upon reflection, Shook realized that the manager perceived thinking of people as assets to be computed as any other number in an ROI calculation was inherently disrespectful. Instead, the manager believed that people should be considered the strength of an organization.

IShook, executive chairman and senior advisor of Lean Enterprises, was the first American manager in Japan at Toyota and has both an academic and business career that spans across the world. Read more about him and his experiences and teaching at the website of lean.org.

How leaders think about followers impacts the relationships among employees and, ultimately, shapes the organizational culture. For example, if leaders think of employees purely as replaceable tools that can be interchanged at any given time like a spare part, this may lead to an us-versus-them attitude that divides the organizational culture. A leader who thinks this way, may find that the physical person can be replaced but not always the knowledge that person had of their work and the company. If leaders think of employees as partners who work to achieve the company’s mission, a give-and-take exchange working relationship built on trust can develop. It is also interesting to study the trend of independent contractors, part-time employees, freelancers, and vendors. Studying how these different types of employment models vary in terms of contract and relationships can be helpful to managers to better understand the behavior of employees and their impact on organizational culture.

Learning Objectives

This week, you will:

• Evaluate organizational perspectives on employee-organizational relationships
• Develop personal human resource philosophies for managing people

Skills

You will develop the following skills:

• Analyze human resource management in organizations
• Apply theoretical concepts to practical cases

Resources

Note: To access this week’s library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Readings

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

• Chapter 6, “People and Organizations” (pp. 115–135)
• Chapter 7, “Improving Human Resource Management” (pp. 135–160)
• Chapter 7, “Exhibit 7.1: Basic Human Resources Strategies” (p. 137)
• Chapter 8, “Interpersonal and Group Dynamics” (pp. 157–182)

Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

• Chapter 7, “Exploring Plato’s Cave: Organizations as Psychic Prisons” (pp. 207–240)

Walden University Online Writing Center. (2013). APA Style: Overview. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa

MGMT 8005M:Week 4: The Human Resource Frame Essay Assignment Paper

Discussion: The Relationship Between Organizations and Employees

Some organizations treat their employees as professionals who bring strengths to the company; but in other companies, employees are exploited, considered easily replaceable, not listened to, and treated more like tools than human beings. The difference in these two types of behavior toward employees is at the heart of the Toyota anecdote (Shook, 2008).

This week, you will focus on the relationship between organizations and their employees. You will examine two companies with differing philosophies and have the opportunity to develop your own human resource philosophy for relationships with employees.

Day 3: Initial Post

Post by Day 3 an evaluation of the organizational perspectives of Apple offshore and Nucor (Ch. 6 of Bolman & Deal, 2017) and explain which organization you think is more effective. You can research and find case studies and articles on each of these companies to learn more about the organizational perspectives and results in the literature that are just briefly touched upon in Bolman and Deal (2017).

Be sure to review the Objectives listed for this week and refer to the Discussion Rubric as guidance for the criteria that will be used to assess your participation in this Discussion.

Day 5: Response

Respond by Day 5 to at least two of your colleagues’ postings. In your responses, be sure to address one of the following:

• Expand on your colleague’s posting.
• What insights did you gain from your colleague’s posting?
• Offer an alternative suggestion.
• If you reside outside of the United States, how might this information apply?

Note: Include proper APA citations to support all statements by referencing at least two sources from this week’s recommended readings as well as two additional sources from relevant peer-reviewed publications.

We have advanced nursing paper writers to help on MGMT 8005M:Week 4: The Human Resource Frame Essay Assignment Paper